Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore D.O.C.G. Brut Millesimato

               This is the number one sparkling wine from the Bortolomiol traditional line. The Roman numeral on the bottle and the name Prior bear testament to the fact that Giuliano Bortolomiol had the intuition to create a brut Prosecco at a time when it was only ever an extra dry. Prior symbolises Giuliano’s pioneering spirit and his belief in Prosecco di Valdobbiadene (now Valdobbiadene Prosecco Superiore Docg) and in the Martinotti Charmat sparkling wine-making method with fermentation in an autoclave, also known as the Italian Method.

               The highlights of the aromatic spectrum here are cleanliness and fineness. The fruity hints are very strong, with sharp green apple and citrus standing out and complemented by fresh floral hints. The agile flavour developing on the palette is felt at once, vital and dry. The freshness of this wine makes it ideal as an aperitif with sea food and with dishes dressed with extra virgin olive oil, such as fish salad. It also goes very well with lard crostini. Tasting & text by Michele Bressan



AREA OF ORIGIN The Valdobbiadene hills
VARIETAL Glera (formally known as Prosecco)
TRAINING SYSTEM Autochthonous called “capuccina modificata”
HARVEST PERIOD From 15 september to 30 september
WINEMAKING Off skins by gentle pressing
PRIMARY FERMENTATION Controlled temperature with selected yeasts
FOAMING 25 - 30 days
FINING From 1 to 3 months
ALCOHOL 12 % Vol.
COLOUR Pale Yellow
PERLAGE Fine and persistent
BOUQUET Delicate, fruity and aromatic
TASTE Velvety, fruity and aromatic



 “3 Bicchieri” Gambero Rosso 2016
“Medaglia di Bronzo” International Wine Challenge 2014
“Commended” International Wine Challenge 2013
“Medaglia d’Argento” International Wine Challenge 2012
“Medaglia di Bronzo” Decanter World Wine Award 2014
“Medaglia di Bronzo” Prosecco Master Award 2016
“Quattro sfere” Guida di Cucina & vini Sparkle 2014
“88 POINTS” Wine Enthusiast 2013
“Fascetta d’oro” Primavera del Prosecco 2012
“Commended” Decanter World Wine Awards 2012


Frame rates for slow-motion recordings may range from 60 frames per second (fps) to 960 frames per second (fps), depending on the camera's capabilities. Due to the fact that phase-detection autofocus is substantially quicker than contrast detection autofocus, clearer photographs may be captured. With a better resolution, an electronic viewfinder produces a crisper picture, providing a view that is equivalent in quality to the one presented on an optical viewfinder.
A quicker maximum shutter speed helps you to capture images of fast-moving subjects without the images becoming blurry. Sensor shift is the movement of the image sensor in order to compensate any vibrations caused by the camera. This implies that the picture will be stabilized independent Nikon D600 vs Nikon D750 of the lens that is being used to capture it. The following is a side-by-side comparison of the Nikon D750 and Nikon D600's rear views. The front view size comparison of the Nikon D750 and Nikon D600 is shown in the image below.
Nikon D600 vs Nikon D750
Physical Comparison of the Nikon D600 and Nikon D750
Nikon D750 Nikon D600
The following is a side-by-side comparison of the D600 and the D750's front-view dimensions. Those who wish to take their camera about with them on a regular basis should consider the weight and size of the camera. In this post, we will compare and contrast the Nikon D600 and Nikon D750, which are both advanced DSLR cameras manufactured by Nikon and both of which are reviewed here. There is a significant difference in the resolution of the sensors between the D600 and the D750, although they both have the same identical sensor specifications.
Nikon D600 vs Nikon D750: Which Is Better?
The Monster Adapter LA-KE1 allows Pentax users to utilize several of their K-mount lenses with complete autofocus on Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras, allowing them to expand their lens lineup. If you want to take casual photographs in either bright light or low light, none of these cameras will be the best choice. The Nikon D600, on the other hand, is a better option if you are a professional photographer who requires high quality images with a narrow depth of focus. In addition, it boasts a greater selection of lenses than the Nikon D750, making it a more versatile camera. The D600 and D750 score 56 and 57, respectively, in terms of portability when measured in terms of their size and weight. Here is a sneak peek at some of the gallery photographs taken using the Nikon D600 and Nikon D750 cameras.
A larger megapixel count indicates that the camera is capable of recording greater amounts of information. The megapixel count, on the other hand, is not the only factor that influences the overall quality of a photograph. Most current cameras are capable of shooting video in some form or another, but these are the models we'd recommend if you want to capture video in addition to your photographs. We picked cameras that are capable of taking excellent images and making it simple to capture professional-quality video, rather than devices that would be suitable for a dedicated filmmaker. A decent landscape camera should have a high resolution and a broad dynamic range; it should also be weather-sealed to be effective in all weather conditions.
Another consideration is weight, which is particularly significant when choosing a camera that you will be carrying about with you all day. The Nikon D750 weighs 10g less than the Nikon D600, however we don't believe this will make a major impact in terms of performance. The top view comparison of the Nikon D750 and Nikon D600 is now available for your viewing pleasure. Before we get into our more in-depth comparison of the Nikon D750 vs Nikon D600, let's take a quick glance at the primary characteristics of each camera. In addition, the D750 sports a tilting LCD screen that can be adjusted in both height and angle, as well as a somewhat smaller 3.2-inch 921k dot screen. Even the included flash is inadequate, and will only be helpful in the most difficult lighting circumstances.